Back in the 1970s, when I was still growing up, I remember hearing of estrogen with regards to the new woman and her control of her womb. For about 20 years I forgot about it. Then, one day about 16 years ago, it surfaced again.
This time on ABC radio of Australia, estrogen had become the villain in a major cultural shift. Women that had been using it over the previous two decades were producing sons that lacked the spunk, boldness, and drive characteristic of boys in particular and male mammals in general. On the opposite end girls were more aggressive, more bold, more physical that the boys. As a result an uncomfortable amount of Australian boys were not going to college, were quitting high school, avoiding the military and civil service as too harsh. They did not like to be yelled at. Hard physical contact was daunting. Now at first the people laughed. The girls were tougher than those weak boys. Those limp wristed boys. But, but a few began to ask what happens if the military is bereft of men? Civil services without men? Hard work without willing men? More females, once the laughing subsided, began to realize they would be marrying down, not up. Were evermore in the very uncomfortable position of being the initiator of male/female relationships and doing more of the heavy lifting in decisions and simply heavy lifting. No longer a laughing matter a culprit was sought and two were found. The first was the estrogen taken by Australian mothers and the second was the United Nations. Yes, the UNTO's heavy hand on Australian culture. In its skewed attempt of making all people equal, its method punished boys for being boys that acted in ways unlike girls. The loud, rollicking, skylarking boys that have existed since or before Adam and Eve was no longer tolerated, if it offended girls. Not as an act of hostility towards girls, but simply what was not normally in their nature. Here came more mollifying medications and penalties.
During all this a now very famous American went through Australia and lauded the affects on Australian boys and she would show up again.
A year or two later, as I listened to the BBC on my shortwave radio, and landlord of Australia, England, was goring through similar throws and estrogen and the UNTO was pointed out as culprits. This politician, making her way through Britain lauded this as well and yearned for the day when the USA would follow suit. Mrs. Clinton has certainly risen in the ranks. American boys, experiencing similar woes, had a major problem: they were in the USA. Here we tend to do everything else but the most sensible first. This way some residue of error becomes institutionalized.
Muscular, loud, tough men were brought in to scare and discipline boys. All male classrooms (probably PC classrooms still) were established and, as usual, more money. No mention of estrogen or the UNTO. I brought this up on a Christian talk radio show and the host seemed unaware of it, but not his guest. She knew well the influence of the UNTO on California schools.
I now hear of the affects of estrogen on girls: early physical maturity, taller, more aggressive and, in worst cases, early menopause. This can prevent the girls, as women, from having children and some One Worlders that claim to be helping maintain sustainability, could not be happier! So I take an exaggerated approach to this phenomena with this romantic cartoon.
